The Peculiar Placement of Athens Acropolis

The Acropolis in Athens sits high above the city on a peculiar limestone mound. The Acropolis has had many uses since its installment: it provided a vantage point for defending the city, and fresh water springs around the base of the mound provided a place to wash and bathe. But most importantly, because of the immense size of the towering limestone outcrop, the Acropolis sat high above the city for all to see. It was a point of pride for the ancient Athenians, as well as a place to worship the gods. The Acropolis is unique because of its placement on the limestone mound, but what makes this mound special? 

Limestone was not deposited in this area, it was deposited about 120 km away and was moved to Athens by tectonic activity. The limestone is about 100 million years old and lies on top of Athenian “Schist” which is only 70 million years old. So why is the older limestone on top of a younger schist?
The limestone was deposited as a regionally extensive body. Limestone is formed when calcium carbonate precipitates out of solution in a shallow marine environment. The calcium carbonate is deposited on the seafloor where it accumulates over a long period of time and is then lithified. Because of its composition, limestone is a very strong rock, it is not easily broken. It would require a great deal of force to move it even an inch. (Pictured here is a limestone pedestal from the Ancient Agora of Athens).
About 35 million years ago limestone was thrust over top of the Athenian Schist during a tectonic event known as the Alpine Orogeny which was responsible for building the Swiss Alps. In order to move a layer of rock such as limestone and emplace it on top of another existing layer requires a great amount of sheer force. This type of force is called a thrust fault. The thrust fault is responsible for the peculiar placement of the limestone in this area. (This is a diagram of a thrust fault. The limestone is thrust over top of the schist).
There are other limestone mounds around Athens from this same faulting event. The Acropolis, though it is built on limestone is actually composed of marble from the surrounding area. Marble is metamorphosed limestone. When the thrust fault occurred, the sheer stress of forcing the limestone over top of what was then shale, heated and pressurized the rock turning some of the limestone into marble, and turning the shale into schist along the fault plane. Heat produced by fault movement can cause metamorphism along the fault plane. This is called contact metamorphism. (In this photo a marble footpath on the right sits next to an outcrop of schist on the path up to the Acropolis).
This is a sketch of what the limestone mound looks like in cross section. The limestone sits atop a layer called cataclasite. Cataclasite is broken up pieces of the limestone and some shale, it represents the fault plane of the thrust fault. Below the cataclasite is the Athenian Schist. Normal faults cut through all of the layers of rock present, indicating that the faulting happened after all the rock was in place. This normal faulting is a result of extensional forces that have been ongoing since the Pleistocene epoch.
The Athenian Acropolis still stands today due to its impervious marble constitution and significant placement atop the limestone hill. The hill provides a vantage point for defense due to it’s towering height. In addition fresh water springs come out of the base of the limestone hill due to water permeating the limestone and being flushed out through the cataclastite. The Acropolis has been under attack many times, it has been destroyed, abandoned, but never forgotten through the course of history because of its installment on the limestone hill. If this bold feature had not been built atop such a prominent geologic outcrop, it surely would have been destroyed and forgotten with time, but it still stands strong today.

6 thoughts on “The Peculiar Placement of Athens Acropolis

  1. Emily,
    As I read through your blog I felt like there were too things missing: (1) I wanted to know why the faulting was occurring and (2) I wanted to understand where the rock types actually are on the picture of the Acropolis (as shown in your sketch).

    The third to last picture needs some correction. The Athenian Schist is actually not a schist. It is called that because it looks metamorphosed, but it is largely mudstones. The marble was of course formed through metamorphism. Heat produced by the fault movement can cause metamorphism along the plane. Please correct that information.

    The layer in between the schist and the limestone is cataclastite. That rock type is the important control of the spring locations.

    Nice work! Lisa

  2. Dear EKunk: I have a lot to learn about geology. Did you know that the Acropolis has a few parts missing? Yes, indeed, it seems the English carried off parts of the temple for display in the British Museum in London. Good article. I had no idea that the hill it sat atop was so formed.

    1. Thanks for reading my post and leaving a comment @DadKunk. Yes the acropolis has been ransacked a number of times! indeed.

  3. Hi Emily,

    Wow, you got to visit the Acropolis? Was this before venturing off to Santorini, or do I have my geography confused? It’s a good idea to let your narrative include a few more details of your wonderful course so far away from Flagstaff. Side-stories are often a great way to provide your family and friends back home an idea of the larger picture of your daily adventures.

    Before I read professor Skinner’s post, I thought a schist was a schist is a schist. Now I know that there’s more to it.

    This sentence is a good one for you to consider as you continue blogging about Santorini. “About 35 million years ago limestone was thrust over top of the Athenian Schist during a tectonic event known as the Alpine Orogeny which was responsible for building the Swiss Alps.” What works very well is how you connect Greece with the Swiss Alps through geology. Who knew that the same tectonic event was responsible for the Athenian and Swiss formations? That additional detail helps readers like me understand what all is going on under your feet.

    I encourage you to tell a story or two, include what is going on geologically, and remember to write for your jealous readers at NAU. I look forward to the next post.

  4. Saludos Emily!

    Thank you for this interesting post! You are assisting people like me, who are interested in learning new things but can’t quite travel, pick up some awesome information. You were smart to use the images with the captions as together they work to help lay people, such as myself, understand geology a bit better.

    The thing about blogs is that the reader essentially lives vicariously through the writer. We are learning with you and experiencing everything through your words. Along with your factual information, give us more context and use your words to help paint the landscape in our heads. You started this in the beginning when you talked about Ancient Greece, but what do these limestone shifts and pedestals mean in modern day Greece? Your last picture is beautiful because it shows the Acropolis in the back with modern buildings in the front. Do you think this visual representation reflects how locals feel about Ancient Greece and the geological wonders found here?

    I look forward to reading your next entry!

    1. Thank you for the helpful comment! You’re right. Looking back I felt like I could have explained things more in detail to give more context. I will work on this for my next post. Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s